This is risky for me...

... to write something about this. Especially with the new hashtag #factcheck Haha.

Because I've hardly heard a word of what she has to say. And it can stay that way as far as I'm concerned. And why?

Children areCrazymade with that climate state. People are already talking about people with 'climate depression'. Yes, of course! We owe this mainly to politicians and the MSM. If you're going to tell kids that they have to carry all environmental problems around the world on their shoulders, yes, you're probably not gonna feel well. They are threatened with a kind of apocalypse that would take place within a few years. Global famine, natural disasters, floods, drought, rising sea levels,... The worst images/animations and predictions are presented to them (and us).

Back to Greta. The question I ask myself is, what the hell does a 16-year-old kid have to say, what could be of benefit to us? She is, as it were, a symbol of the green hype. She was freaked out first, and then she gets a platform. What does she know about or draw from life experience? Has she been involved in research or is it just prechewed for her? I think that last one. That girl is being abused.

And I'm afraid that in a couple of years she and many children with her, she's going to have psychological problems. You can't let a 16-year-old solve world problems, that's gonna take its toll.

Loading full article...

Kinderen van 16 kunnen volwassener zijn dan 'volwassenen'
@Henkjan de Krijger Dat is zo. Maar waar haalt zij alle wijsheid vandaan? En is dit alles niet teveel voor iemand van 16? Wereldpolitiek en wereldklimaat?
More replies (3)
Nou, daar kan ik het helemaal mee eens zijn! En ja, je moet tegenwoordig erg oppassen wat je schrijft! ;)
@Marjolein Dank je! Ja, vooral om dat het niet onderbouwd is. Maar soms is een beetje 'boerenverstand' al meer dan genoeg, haha. Dus in die zin dan toch wel.