This blog about a post of Ingrid.A sensitive topic, controversial and certainly important! In this blog I go further on findings of Ingrid, she denounces things that are often at odds with each other. A response from me has been so long and extensive, so I prefer to do this in a separate post, incl. video of YouTube and various links.

In this I am not (only) assuming statements, facts or other evidence but also a bit of logic with a pinch of intuition. So, did I not say that nicely?

Please read the post of Ingrid below:

Opposites list

And to this my reaction:

That 5G that is something new so all disaster scenarios go out of the closet. That is always the case. But not entirely wrong I think. People find it strange that diseases like cancer and dementia occur so often. Actually, that's not so weird. Also our brains and other parts of the body receive continuously, day and night, 24/7, 365 days a year 4- or later 5G radiation, wifi, radiation from regular mobile traffic, radiation from the DECT phone, maybe some cosmic radiation, occasionally some radiation at the dentist and we warm up our food with radiation. certain frequency (s). We have all kinds of frequencies in our wireless communication, from X kHz - X MHz. I don't have exact numbers about this. Even the fairly harmless vibrating bath in the opticians, vibrates with a frequency harmful to humans and animals (> 20kHz); the ultrasonic sound. This makes our food warm. Ever noticed that the bacon or meat is boiling hot and the potatoes or vegetables are still freezing cold? Thus the human and animal body also reacts differently on various frequencies. (an extreme example is eg gamma radiation) Think also of your “freezer Fukushima fish ".

Global warming and CO2 emissions:

As far as CO2 emissions are concerned, global warming is also disputed and human influence on it, and there are examples of that on YouTube as well. (see below) Scientists who claim different from what is now generally accepted (thanks to the mass media) are not seen whether Just because their picture 'doesn't fit'. Imagine if there was hard anti-evidence; what a disgrace for scientists, world leaders, etc. Apart from wasted capital, a wrong policy has been applied in all kinds of fields. Well, here's a counter-sound by Prof. Dr. Begemann:


But let's assume that it is as (often) claimed; global warming accelerates, among other things, because more and more (eternal) snow disappears and a dark or black surface emerges. (water/sea) This does not reflect light/heat, as snow does but absorbs So why are there no (huge surface of) mirrors built in e.g. the polar regions? Or another (synthetic) reflecting material like 'blanket'? It is not that we as a human being can turn on the 'thermostat of the earth'. Claims like: “We should not have the earth Temperature fluctuations at local or global level, whether or not long, have always been and will always be there and depend on many complex factors. we sell all our natural gas to Russia etc. is the profit and then another 'problem' comes. See also my blog from 1-2 years ago:

#Global Warming

© 10-04-2019 Copyright; Blog, title and texts from/by: © The Original Enrique (enrique.dutch@gmail.com) All rights reserved/All rights reserved. Images - Hey, Pixabay : https://pixabay.com/illustrations/rays-radio-radio-waves-wave-3819028/

Loading full article...