Publish your guest post instantly!
Why wait for emails? Start publishing guest posts instantly with zero waiting time
- Instant publishing - no approvals
- Dofollow backlinks guaranteed
- Google indexed automatically
- Full editorial control
- Remove sponsored tags
- Permanent post duration
- Save on bulk guest-posting with Premium subscription starting from €25 /mo
- Cancel anytime
Permanent residence recreation house
Program Radar at her 'best'...
It is now 'crying' on several holiday parks, because there is being maintained. Finally! I would say.
First, they willingly live on such a park, knowing that it can be inhabited for a maximum of 9 months per year. In any case, you can know and you're supposed to know that and then it's whining and complaining. It is also not for nothing a recreation house. One must have a regular main residence. Even it is argued as a defense: “Yes, but it was not maintained!” Yes, and? So if one doesn't enforce, you can break the law? It also says: 'I am not cheaper at all, I simply pay levies. ' Yes, I would, if you had a barrel advantage before that!
When I was on home hunting at the time, I also came across very nice houses at Funda with a favorable price. Something in the order of €75,000, - for a cabinet of a house. I wanted to, but I didn't, because permanent residence is not allowed. And with a similar 'ordinary' house, there was another 1 for the amount.
You are jealous...
Yes, I am jealous! I wanted to, somewhere illegally live cheap and later it was then tolerated, as we do in NL often. But I decided to follow the rules.
It seems fair to me to provide the permanent residents of a holiday home with an aftercharge. Namely for the advantage they had with the purchase and one more because the O.Z.B. was always so nice and low. It cannot be that people who violate the law are rewarded and those who follow the rules are more detrimental. Avrotros Radar is obviously very concerned because people are in danger of becoming 'homeless', because people are actually going to be evicted. They better deal with people who are really affected by agencies or companies. “Beings before you begin,” seems to me a wise lesson here.










Op het park waar ik eens een vakantiewoning had, waren andere bewoners die toestemming - zwart op wit - dat ze er mogen wonen. Die toestemming kreeg ik niet. Jammer dan. Ik hoop dat die mensen toestemming krijgen om te mogen wonen waar ze nu wonen. Die mevrouw uit het voorbeeld op televisie die vanaf 5 maart op straat komt te staan met haar zoon. Het is schandalig. Alleen maar omdat er is verteld tegen wethouders dat het vakantiepark weer lucratief gemaakt kan worden. Geld, de macht van het geld. Diegene die daar allang wonen, kunnen stikken en op straat gaan en aan de bedelstaf geraken. Ik zeg - schandalig.
Je mindset is verkeerd in deze. Als ik in mijn eerste huis was blijven wonen. Was ik allang hypotheek vrij geweest. Zo moet je niet rekenen.
















then €5.99/month after 14 days
Start your 14-day free trial now to publish your sponsored content. Cancel anytime.